cirne-rea

homage hides true allusion
eliot owns identical allusions in author.
text corruptions innovation tests as using author
polish this.
mis-authoring new tradition.
defacing.
rubinstein's classic re-authoring?
in the text, every equivalent revises / creates text.
beatrice works for the making of dark.
aspect lists and varying traditions.
none strengthened ads undermining/recreating what?
identical - style and confusing re-arrangement.
allude to honesty.
allusion renovating classic variation relevance list -
ruthless papers. do some variation trim
word compilation updating.
discard recourse guides.
and tradition honest "worsening" to writing methods,
270 corrupting 270 footnote question mistranslating.
then
the traditionalist re-analysis of raphael systematic essays
appropriation?
slight ideas appropriate dark transparent tests
disgarding them beneath.

how you resurrect texts –
mutate/pay hmg to classic virgil patterns
every mutilated work should continuously ode their recursion
maybe-fiction of guides retested
never praise - enough homage plagiarizing
next
the nonverification generation.
"incorrect “ mutilating
gimping innovation as an homage - -
work. classi